Predictors of Virologic and Clinical Response to Nevirapine versus Lopinavir/Ritonavir-based Antiretroviral Therapy in Young Children With and Without Prior Nevirapine Exposure for the Prevention of Mother-to-child HIV Transmission


Authors

Lindsey JC, Hughes MD, Violari A, Eshleman SH, Abrams EJ, Bwakura-Dangarembizi M, Barlow-Mosha L, Kamthunzi P, Sambo PM, Cotton MF, Moultrie H, Khadse S, Schimana W, Bobat R, Zimmer B, Petzold E, Mofenson LM, Jean-Philippe P, Palumbo P; P1060 Study Team.


Journal

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014 Aug;33(8):846-54. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000337


BACKGROUND:

In a randomized trial comparing nevirapine (NVP)-based versus lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV-infected children [primary endpoint discontinuation of study treatment for any reason or virologic failure by week 24] aged 2 months to 3 years, we assessed whether clinical, virologic, immunologic and safety outcomes varied by prior single-dose NVP exposure (PrNVP) for prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission and other covariates.

METHODS:

Efficacy was assessed by time to ART discontinuation or virologic failure, virologic failure/death and death; safety by time to ART discontinuation because of a protocol-defined toxicity and first ≥ grade 3 adverse event; immunology and growth by changes in CD4%, weight/height World Health Organization z-scores from entry to week 48. Cox proportional hazards and linear regression models were used to test whether treatment differences depended on PrNVP exposure and other covariates.

RESULTS:

Over a median follow up of 48 (PrNVP) and 72 (no PrNVP) weeks, there was no evidence of differential treatment effects by PrNVP exposure or any other covariates. LPV/r-based ART was superior to NVP-based ART for efficacy and safety outcomes; however, those on NVP had larger improvements in CD4%, weight and height z-scores. Lower pretreatment CD4% and higher HIV-1 RNA levels were associated with reduced efficacy, lower pretreatment CD4% with shorter time to ART discontinuation because of a protocol-defined toxicity, and no PrNVP with shorter time to first grade ≥3 adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS:

Differences between LPV/r and NVP ART in efficacy, safety, immunologic and growth outcomes did not depend on PrNVP exposure, prior breast-feeding, sex, HIV-1 subtype, age, pretreatment CD4%, HIV-1 RNA or World Health Organization disease stage. This finding should be considered when selecting an ART regimen for young children.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *